Williamson v. Bell et al

Filing 91

ORDER adppting 90 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 72 75 Motions for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 89 Motion for Order. Plaintiff's claims against Defe ndants Shawn Richard, James Booker, and Farrelle Williams, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Plaintiffs claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/3/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHARLES WILLIAMSON
ADC #152796
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 5:14CV00198 SWW

SEVILLE BELL, JR. et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docket entries #72 & #75) are

GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.
2.

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Shawn Richard, James Booker, and Farrelle

Williams, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.

Plaintiff’s claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.
4.

Plaintiff’s motion to grant exhibits (docket entry #89) is DENIED AS MOOT.

5.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 3rd day of March 2015.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE