Bannister v. Hobbs
ORDER adopting as modified 12 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Bannister hasn't made a substantial showing that the Constitution was violated in his case. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/19/2015. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ROBERT E. BANNISTER
RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC
Unopposed recommendation, Ng 12, adopted as modified. FED. R. Crv.
P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Bannister's petition
is untimely. The one-year limitations period began on 28 October 2011 and
ran before Bannister filed his petition. Gonzales v. Thaler, 131 S. Ct. 641, 656
(2012); Camacho v. Hobbs, 774 F.3d 931, 934-35 (8th Cir. 2015). A certificate of
appealability will not issue because Bannister hasn't made a substantial
showing that the Constitution was violated in his case. 28 U.S.C. §
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?