Hill v. Hobbs
ORDER adopting 78 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's 68 72 motions for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order and for inspection, which this Court construes as motions for preliminary injunctive relief are DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/6/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RAY HOBBS, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for preliminary ijunction and
temporary restraining order and for inspection, which this Court construes as motions for
preliminary injunctive relief are DENIED. Documents #68 and #72.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of November, 2014.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?