Lomax v. Banks et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 9 Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing without prejudice Mr. Lomax's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/18/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DAKOTA LOMAX ADC #132458 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00206-KGB JAMES BANKS, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing without prejudice Mr. Lomax’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The relief sought is denied. The Court further certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. SO ADJUDGED this the 18th day of February, 2015. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?