Curtis v. Hobbs et al
ORDER adopting 4 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. Demetrius Curtis's claims are dismissed, without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/3/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NO. 5:14-CV-210 JLH/BD
RAY HOBBS, et al.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After carefully reviewing the Recommendation, the timely
objections, and upon conducting a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that
the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s
findings in all respects.1
Demetrius Curtis’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice. In addition, the
Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and
not taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of July, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
After Judge Deere issued her recommendation, Curtis filed two documents alleging
claims for retaliation and racial discrimination. See Documents #6 and #7. Those claims are
separate from the claim asserted in Curtis’s initial complaint and will not be considered in this
action. If Curtis intends to pursue those claims, he must commence new lawsuits for them.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?