Brazell v. Ruh et al
Filing
37
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 11 20 PARTIAL PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 3 motion for preliminary injunction and TRO; denying 10 second motion for TRO; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL BRAZELL, Jr.
ADC #500711
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:14-cv-00238-KGB-JJV
A. RUH, Lieutenant, Maximum
Security Unit; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Dispositions
(“Recommendations”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. Nos. 11,
20). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommendations should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is
denied (Dkt. No. 3).
2.
Plaintiff’s second motion for temporary restraining order is denied (Dkt. No. 10).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the Recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 14th day of October, 2014.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?