Hill v. Iko et al
ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Jones are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/15/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DANIEL HILL, ADC # 148493
No. 5:14CV00239 JLH-JJV
O. Iko; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Jones are DISMISSED without prejudice;
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 15th day of July, 2014.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?