Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction
ORDER adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition 89 submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris; defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted 70 80 and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice; the Court additionally certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order or any judgment entered would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 4/21/16. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHARLES ISAAC WILSON, JR.
OF CORRECTION et al
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.1 After careful consideration, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 70 & 80) are GRANTED, and
plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court additionally certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order or any judgment entered hereunder, would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 21st day of April, 2016.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff did, however, file a motion (and supplement thereto) to amend his complaint
[doc.#’s 90, 91]. Plaintiff’s motion to amend is denied. Rather, plaintiff may file a new action
concerning the actions of which he complains in his motion to amend if he so desires (although
the Court expresses no opinion on the merits of any such action). Plaintiff’s motion [doc.#92]
for the Court to contact him and advise him as to what to do in light of the legal developments in
his case is denied.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?