Sparks v Jackson et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitu tes a strike within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/26/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DAVID LEE SPARKS,
ADC #143843
v.

PLAINTIFF

5:14CV00253-JM-JTK

SGT. HUGHES, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED without prejudice, for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment

dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2014.

______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1