Harris v. Hobbs

Filing 19

ORDER adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Harris's 2 petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. The requested relief is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/19/2015. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PAUL HARRIS, ADC #154185 v. PETITIONER No. 5:14CV00254-JLH-JJV WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction1 RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which Paul Harris has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Harris’s petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Document #2. The requested relief is denied. DATED this 19th day of February, 2015. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The petition named Ray Hobbs as the respondent. Mr. Hobbs retired on October 31, 2014, and was replaced by Larry Norris as Interim Director. Wendy Kelley was appointed as Director on January 13, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Ms. Kelley is automatically substituted as the respondent in place of Mr. Hobbs.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?