DeHart v. Rhodes et al
ORDER approving and adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Ms. DeHart's claims against defendant K. Mayes for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/20/2015. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ERIKA N. DEHART
Case No. 5:14-cv-00262-KGB-JJV
RHODES; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 5) and what the Court construes as plaintiff Erika N.
DeHart’s objections (Dkt. No. 12). After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo
review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
The Court dismisses without prejudice Ms. DeHart’s claims against defendant K.
Mayes for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 20th day of May, 2015.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?