Hutts v. Kelley et al
ORDER ADOPTING 8 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety. Plaintiff James Hutts's allegations that he was denied redress through the grievance process in violation of his First Amendment rights is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/04/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Case No. 5:14-cv-00269-KGB-JTK
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). After a review of the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto (Dkt. No. 14), as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, it is therefore ordered
that plaintiff James Hutts’s allegations that he was denied redress through the grievance process
in violation of his First Amendment rights is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted.
SO ORDERED this the 4th day of December, 2014.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?