Hutts v. Kelley et al
ORDER adopting 71 77 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; denying Plaintiff James Hutt's 69 motion for injunctive relief; granting defendants' 64 motion for summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Donna Gordon-Buie, Genia Snyder, and Amanda Watt; and dismissing with prejudice defendants Ojibagu Iko, M.D., Connie Hubbard, Jennifer McBride-Andrews, and Deborah York. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/30/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received two Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendations”)
from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 71, 77). No objections have
been filed to either Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has passed. After a review
of the Recommendations, this Court adopts them in their entirety.
The Court therefore denies plaintiff James Hutts’s motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 69)
and grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 64). This Court dismisses without
prejudice defendants Donna Gordon-Buie, Genia Snyder, and Amanda Watt and dismisses with
prejudice defendants Ojibagu Iko, M.D., Connie Hubbard, Jennifer McBride-Andrews, and Deborah
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2015.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?