Quarles v. Briggs

Filing 57

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS the motion for summary judgment filed by defts Adams, Briggs and Clark is granted 41 ; Quarles's claims against Adams and Clark and her claims against Briggs in her official capacity only, are dismissed with prejudice; Adams and Clark are dismissed as parties; pltf's motions for directed verdict 32 and to dismiss 47 are denied. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/12/15. (tjb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KRISTINA QUARLES
ADC #760441
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:14CV00302 BSM

JULIA BRIGGS et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been
reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record,
it is concluded that the PRD should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Edward Adams, Julia

Briggs, and Tasha Clark [Doc. No. 41] is granted, Quarles’s claims against Adams and Clark,
and her claims against Briggs in her official capacity only, are dismissed with prejudice.
2.

Defendants Adams and Clark are dismissed as parties.

3.

Quarles’s motion for a directed verdict [Doc. No. 32] and Briggs’s motion to

dismiss [Doc. No. 47] are denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of March 2015.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE