Davis v. Hobbs
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Motion for Reconsideration. Davis's belated objections, 14 , do not raise anything new. They're overruled. The Court again adopts the recommended decision but adds one modification. The one year limitations period began on 5 September 2003 and ran before Davis filed his petition. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/19/2015. (jak)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NICHOLAS DAVIS
ADC#128996
v.
PETITIONER
No. 5:14-cv-309-DPM-JTR
ARTIS RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC
RESPONDENT
ORDER
Motion to reconsider, NQ 15, granted. Davis's belated objections, NQ 14,
do not raise anything new. They' re overruled. On de novo review, the Court
again adopts the recommended decision but adds one modification. The oneyear limitations period began on 5 September 2003 and ran before Davis filed
his petition. Gonzales v. Thaler, 131 S. Ct. 641, 656 (2012); Camacho v. Hobbs, 774
F.3d 931, 934-35 (8th Cir. 2015).
So Ordered.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
