Avist v. Nulls et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing 2 the plaintiff's complaint, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; counting the dismissal of this action as a "strike;" and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/4/2014. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ADC # 151395
CASE NO. 5:14CV311 BSM
KIM NULLS, Supervisor, Jefferson
County Parole Officers, et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections have been reviewed. After careful
consideration of the objections and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the
proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s complaint [Doc No. 2] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §
It is further certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal taken from this order and judgment dismissing this action is considered
frivolous and not in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of September 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?