Tarkington v. Peppers-Davis et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Partial Report and Recommendations. Defendants Shock, Carswell and Hoffman are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Plaintiff is allowed to proceed only with his deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Peppers-Davis. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/18/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOHNNY TARKINGTON,
ADC # 85550
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:14CV00322-JM-JJV
SONYA PEPPERS DAVIS, Doctor, C.C.S.,
Tucker Max Prison Infirmary; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the
objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted
in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants Shock, Carswell, and Hoffman are DISMISSED without prejudice;
2.
Plaintiff is allowed to proceed only with his deliberate indifference claim against
Defendant Peppers-Davis;
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 18th day of September, 2014.
_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?