Washington v. Wright et al
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/29/2014. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
GLENDA WRIGHT, Administrator/Supervisor
of Kitchen, Dub Brassell Detention Center; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the objections and
making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2014.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?