Washington v. Wright et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/29/2014. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ATHENA WASHINGTON
v.

PLAINTIFF
5:14CV00337-JM-JJV

GLENDA WRIGHT, Administrator/Supervisor
of Kitchen, Dub Brassell Detention Center; et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the objections and
making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

2.

This dismissal constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation

Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2014.

_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1