Scott v. Watson et al
ORDER adopting 63 recommendation; granting 46 the motion for summary judgment; and dismissing Scott's complaint, with prejudice. Scott's suggestion that the Magistrate Judge didn't thoroughly consider the record is unfounded and intemperate. If Scott peppers his papers with such things again, the Court will sanction him. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/10/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RANDY WATSON, Warden, Varner Super Max;
WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of
Correction; GRANT HARRIS, Assistant Director, ADC;
RAYMOND NAYLOR, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator,
ADC; MOSES JACKSON, Assistant Warden, Varner Super
Max; WARDELL BROOKS, Correctional Officer, Varner
Super Max; EVERETT G. LITZSEY, JR., Sergeant, East
Regional Unit; and JAMES PLUMMER, Lieutenant,
Varner Super Max
1. On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 63, and
overrules Scott's objections, NQ 66.
R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
summary judgment, NQ 46, granted. Scott's complaint will be dismissed with
2. Scott's suggestion that the Magistrate Judge didn't thoroughly
consider the record is unfounded and intemperate. If Scott peppers his
papers with such things again, the Court will sanction him.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United State District Judge
lo .feJ,,v~y .:<.017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?