Scott v. Watson et al

Filing 67

ORDER adopting 63 recommendation; granting 46 the motion for summary judgment; and dismissing Scott's complaint, with prejudice. Scott's suggestion that the Magistrate Judge didn't thoroughly consider the record is unfounded and intemperate. If Scott peppers his papers with such things again, the Court will sanction him. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/10/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

DEVERICK SCOTT
ADC #131042

v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 5:14-cv-346-DPM

RANDY WATSON, Warden, Varner Super Max;
WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of
Correction; GRANT HARRIS, Assistant Director, ADC;
RAYMOND NAYLOR, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator,
ADC; MOSES JACKSON, Assistant Warden, Varner Super
Max; WARDELL BROOKS, Correctional Officer, Varner
Super Max; EVERETT G. LITZSEY, JR., Sergeant, East
Regional Unit; and JAMES PLUMMER, Lieutenant,
Varner Super Max
DEFENDANTS

ORDER
1. On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 63, and
overrules Scott's objections, NQ 66.

FED.

R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Motion for

summary judgment, NQ 46, granted. Scott's complaint will be dismissed with
prejudice.
2. Scott's suggestion that the Magistrate Judge didn't thoroughly
consider the record is unfounded and intemperate. If Scott peppers his
papers with such things again, the Court will sanction him.

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United State District Judge
lo .feJ,,v~y .:<.017
I

-2-