Pearcy v. Partain

Filing 20

ORDER adopting 19 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendant's motion for sanctions, 17 , is granted in part and denied in part. This action is dismissed without pre judice due to Plaintiff's failure to diligently prosecute it. The parties shall bear their own costs at this time. If Plaintiff attempts to revisit this matter, he shall compensate Defendant Partain for the April 7, 2015 court reporter's fee before being allowed to proceed. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/4/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KEVIN RAY PEARCY, ADC # 146408 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:14CV00348-JLH-JJV JULIA PARTAIN, Licensed Certified Social Worker, Varner Unit, ADC DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: A. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to diligently prosecute it. B. The parties shall bear their own costs at this time. If Plaintiff attempts to revisit this matter, he shall compensate Defendant Partain for the April 7, 2015 court reporter’s fee before being allowed to proceed. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 4th day of June, 2015. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?