Doering v. Does

Filing 19

ORDER approving and adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff Alan Doering's claims against the John Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/03/2016. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ALAN DOERING ADC #106115 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00350 KGB/PSH JOHN DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 18). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff Alan Doering’s claims against the John Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Dated this 3rd day of February, 2016. __________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?