Doering v. Does
Filing
19
ORDER approving and adopting 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that plaintiff Alan Doering's claims against the John Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 02/03/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ALAN DOERING
ADC #106115
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:14-cv-00350 KGB/PSH
JOHN DOES
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by
Magistrate Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 18). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing
objections has passed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety
as this Court's findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that plaintiff Alan Doering’s claims against the John Doe
defendants are dismissed without prejudice.
Dated this 3rd day of February, 2016.
__________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?