Perry v. Jefferson County Jail et al
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. The 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal is considered a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies than an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/7/2015. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
FLOYD E. PERRY
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:14CV00370-JM-JJV
JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the objections and
making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
This cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2
This dismissal is considered a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison Litigation
Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
DATED this 7th day of January, 2015.
_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?