Chism v. Griswold et al
Filing
7
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim; finding that dismissal of this action counts as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 04/22/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CODY J. CHISM
ADC #138088
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:14-cv-00377-KGB/JTR
LASONYA GRISWOLD, Nurse,
Cummins Unit; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition from
United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 6). No objections have been filed, and
the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that
the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted (Dkt. No. 2).
2.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2015.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?