Dickson v. Gladden et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety in all respects 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing without prejudice 2 Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/8/2014. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES T. DICKSON,
No. 5:14CV00409 JLH/JTR
CHUCK GLADDEN, Chaplain,
Delta Regional Unit, ADC, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Ray and plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering
the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order or the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2014.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?