Releford v. Lester et al

Filing 38

ORDER Approving and Adopting 37 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting defendants' 33 motion for summary judgment; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Releford's claims against defendant Larry Crane; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this case would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 09/12/2016. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARCUS RELEFORD v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00420-KGB-PSH MIRIAM LESTER, MARK COLBERT, JOHN FELTS, RAY HOBBS, and LARRY CRANE DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Patricia Harris (Dkt. No. 37). Plaintiff Marcus Releford has not filed an objection, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendation and the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Accordingly, the Court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33) and dismisses with prejudice Mr. Releford’s claims against defendant Larry Crane . The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this case would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So ordered this 12th day of September, 2016. ________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?