Davis v. Bolden et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 4 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. The Court will construe Plaintiff's 7 objections as a supplement to his complaint. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/2/2015. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY JOE DAVIS, JR. v. PLAINTIFF 5:14CV000454-JM-JTK BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. The Court has reviewed those proposed findings and recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and made a de novo review of the record. It appears from his objections that Plaintiff is now claiming that Defendants Bolden, Tyler and Adams failed to ensure that Plaintiff receive proper medical care. Although Plaintiff was previously allowed to amend his Complaint and failed to do so, the Court will construe these objections as a supplement to his complaint. In light of these new allegations, the Court declines to adopt the Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations [4] are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2015. __________________________________ JAMES M. MOODY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?