Harris v. Ford et al

Filing 58

ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 57 Recommended Partial Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and granting in part and denying in part defendant Tommy Stringfellow's 36 motion for summary judgment. Plain tiff Ivie Harris, Jr., may proceed with his claims alleging that Mr. Stringfellow, in his individual capacity only: (a) used or authorized the use of excessive force against Mr. Harris; and (b) denied Mr. Harris adequate medical care for the injuries he claims to have sustained during the use of force. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/13/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION IVIE HARRIS, JR ADC #122723 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00458-KGB-JTR TOMMY STRINGFELLOW, Former Jail Administrator, Dallas County Detention Center DEFENDANT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 57). No objections have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Recommended Partial Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. It is therefore ordered that defendant Tommy Stringfellow’s motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff Ivie Harris, Jr., may proceed with his claims alleging that Mr. Stringfellow, in his individual capacity only: (a) used or authorized the use of excessive force against Mr. Harris; and (b) denied Mr. Harris adequate medical care for the injuries he claims to have sustained during the use of force. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2016. KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?