Harris v. Ford et al
Filing
58
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 57 Recommended Partial Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and granting in part and denying in part defendant Tommy Stringfellow's 36 motion for summary judgment. Plain tiff Ivie Harris, Jr., may proceed with his claims alleging that Mr. Stringfellow, in his individual capacity only: (a) used or authorized the use of excessive force against Mr. Harris; and (b) denied Mr. Harris adequate medical care for the injuries he claims to have sustained during the use of force. All other claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/13/2016. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
IVIE HARRIS, JR
ADC #122723
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:14-cv-00458-KGB-JTR
TOMMY STRINGFELLOW,
Former Jail Administrator,
Dallas County Detention Center
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Partial Disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 57). No objections have been filed, and the time for
filing objections has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Recommended
Partial Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s
findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that defendant Tommy Stringfellow’s motion for summary judgment
is granted in part and denied in part (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff Ivie Harris, Jr., may proceed with his
claims alleging that Mr. Stringfellow, in his individual capacity only: (a) used or authorized the use
of excessive force against Mr. Harris; and (b) denied Mr. Harris adequate medical care for the
injuries he claims to have sustained during the use of force. All other claims are dismissed with
prejudice.
SO ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2016.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?