Mason v. Hobbs
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 dismissing petitioner's habeas for being time barred; the Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right; the certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 12/3/15. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ERIC EUGENE MASON
CASE NO. 5:15CV00002 BRW/PSH
WENDY KELLEY, Director of the
Arkansas Department of Correction
The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge
Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that
the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in
the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of
appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if
the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a
denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2015.
/s/Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?