Scott v. Watson et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 defts Randy Watson, Pace, Williams, Franklin, Sharon Cantrell, Ray Hobbs, Larry Mae, Grant Harris, Raymond Naylor, Terri Bannister, the Arkansas Department of Correction, Burl, Tameka Cody, Thorn and Does are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/15/15. (tjb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DEVERICK SCOTT, ADC # 131042 v. PLAINTIFF 5:15CV00007-BRW-JJV WATSON, Warden, Varner Supermax Unit; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Randy Watson, Pace, Williams, Franklin, Sharon Cantrell, Ray Hobbs, Larry Mae, Grant Harris, Raymond Naylor, Terri Bannister, the Arkansas Department of Correction, Burl, Tameka Cody, Thorn, and Does are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith SO ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2015. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?