Lewis v. Jackson et al

Filing 11

ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff may proceed with his claims against Defendants Peppers-Davis, Carswell and Williams; all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against them. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/24/2015. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION AARON MICHAEL LEWIS ADC# 151373 VS. PLAINTIFF 5:15CV00027-BRW-JJV BELINDA KAY JACKSON, Tucker Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed and the time for doing so has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff may proceed with his claims against Defendants Peppers-Davis, Carswell, and Williams. 2. All other Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against them. 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2015. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?