Harp v. Norris et al

Filing 46

ORDER adopting 45 partial recommended disposition; directing the Clerk of Court to alter the docket to reflect that defendant S. Baker is Shay Baker; granting Defendants' 42 motion for summary judgment; dismissing Harp's claims against defendants James Gibson, Shamone McPhadden, Ladarius Williams, and Larry Manning without prejudice; dismissing Harp's claims against defendant Shay Baker with prejudice; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 05/04/2016. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TONY A. HARP, ADC # 139721 PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 5:15CV00067 BSM LARRY NORRIS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the partial recommended disposition is hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of Court alter the docket to reflect that defendant “S. Baker” is “Shay Baker.” 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 42] is granted. A. Harp’s claims against defendants James Gibson, Shamone McPhadden, Ladarius Williams, and Larry Manning are dismissed without prejudice due to Harp’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies against them. B. Harp’s claims against defendant Shay Baker are dismissed with prejudice. 3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of May 2016. __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?