Cook v. Bland et al
ORDER rejecting 4 the recommended disposition. Since the plaintiff has now filed 6 a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, he has now complied -albeit late- with 3 the April 13, 20015, Order. This matter is therefore remanded to Judge Caveneau for further consideration. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/28/2015. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:15CV00068 BSM
ESTELLA BLAND, et al.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerry W.
Cavaneau has been received. No objection have been filed, but plaintiff has moved for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 6]. After careful consideration, it is concluded that
the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, rejected.
Dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint is recommended because he failed to comply with
an April 13, 2015, order directing him to either pay the full $400 statutory filing fee or file
an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Doc. No. 3. Since plaintiff has
now filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 6], he has
complied—albeit late—with the April 13, 2015, order. This matter is therefore remanded
to Judge Caveneau for further consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of August 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?