McArthur v. Bolden et al

Filing 77

ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommendations 74 ; granting 64 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bolden and Thompson are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts and Watson are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/9/16. (tjb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
STEVEN LARON MCARTHUR,
ADC #95870
VS.

PLAINTIFF

5:15CV00096-BRW-JTK

KENNIE L. BOLDEN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate
Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations and
Plaintiff’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, I adopt the recommendations in their
entirety.
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bolden and Thompson are DISMISSED
without prejudice, for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bradley, Craig,
Eason, Haynes, Roberts, and Watson are DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2016.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1