McArthur v. Bolden et al

Filing 77

ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommendations 74 ; granting 64 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bolden and Thompson are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts and Watson are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/9/16. (tjb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION STEVEN LARON MCARTHUR, ADC #95870 VS. PLAINTIFF 5:15CV00096-BRW-JTK KENNIE L. BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations and Plaintiff’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, I adopt the recommendations in their entirety. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bolden and Thompson are DISMISSED without prejudice, for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts, and Watson are DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2016. /s/ Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?