McArthur v. Bolden et al
ORDER adopting the proposed findings and recommendations 74 ; granting 64 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bolden and Thompson are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust; plaintiff's claims against defendants Bradley, Craig, Eason, Haynes, Roberts and Watson are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/9/16. (tjb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
STEVEN LARON MCARTHUR,
KENNIE L. BOLDEN, et al.
I have received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate
Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of the proposed findings and recommendations and
Plaintiff’s objections, and a de novo review of the record, I adopt the recommendations in their
Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bolden and Thompson are DISMISSED
without prejudice, for failure to exhaust. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Bradley, Craig,
Eason, Haynes, Roberts, and Watson are DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?