Siemens Industry Inc v. Monticello Arkansas, City of

Filing 121

ORDER granting 117 Motion. The parties may file one joint report on the disputed privilege issues. Neither side may exceed fifteen pages. The Court requests that Siemens take three further steps: redo the privilege log so that the headings appear on every page; file copies of all the disputed documents ex parte and under seal with the joint report; and provide a paper copy of the disputed documents to chambers. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/24/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CITY OF MONTICELLO, ARKANSAS v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:15-cv-127-DPM SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER Motion, NQ 117, granted. The parties may file one joint report on the disputed privilege issues. Neither side may exceed fifteen pages. The Court requests that Siemens take three further steps: redo the privilege log so that the headings appear on every page; file copies of all the disputed documents ex parte and under seal with the joint report; and provide a paper copy of the disputed documents to chambers. So Ordered. D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?