Siemens Industry Inc v. Monticello Arkansas, City of

Filing 53

ORDER: Disovery from Siemens AG is on hold until the Court resolves the jurisdictional issue. The Court will hold a one-hour argument on 35 on 17 November 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom B-155 in Little Rock. This will not be an evidentiary hearing. Siemens AG should prepare its initial disclosures in the interim, and be prepared to make them by 24 November 2015 if the Court concludes it has personal jurisdiction. A Final Scheduling Order, informed by the Rule 26(f) report, will issue. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/27/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF/ COUNTER-DEFENDANT SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. v. No. 5:15-cv-127-DPM CITY OF MONTICELLO, ARKANSAS DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-CLAIMANT v. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT* SIEMENSAG ORDER Rule 26(£) report, Ng 48, noted and appreciated. Discovery from Siemens AG is on hold until the Court resolves the jurisdictional issue. The Court will hold a one-hour argument on NQ 35 on 17 November 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom B-155 in Little Rock. This will not be an evidentiary hearing. Siemens AG should prepare its initial disclosures in the interim, and be prepared to make them by 24 November 2015 if the Court concludes it has personal jurisdiction. A Final Scheduling Order, informed by the Rule 26(£) report, will issue. *The Court earlier mis-designated Siemans AG as a counter-defendant. NQ 28. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket. So Ordered. t D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?