Cooper v. Griswold et al

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING 27 the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; dismissing, without prejudice, defendants Rex G. Lay, Ray Hobbs, Chance, T. Moncrief, Murray, Kimberly Snow, Dana Denise Peyton, Robert Scott, Moskovich, Marvin Evans, Jr ., Seandria Richardson, Coghill, Correctional Medical Services, Correct Care Solutions, Corizon, Wendy Kelley, Rory Griffen, Gardner, Norman, Laura Morgan, Donna Gail Cecil, Rice, and Crystal Woods for failure to state a claim upon which relief may b e granted; dismissing plaintiff's claims which relate to his neurological issues as insufficiently related to the allegations which form the basis of this suit; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/27/2015. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
AUSTIN COOPER,
ADC # 078084
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:15CV00170 BSM-JJV

GRISWOLD, Assistant Nurse
Practitioner, Cummins Unit, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been received.
After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and
hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants Rex G. Lay, Ray Hobbs, Chance, T. Moncrief, Murray, Kimberly

Snow, Dana Denise Peyton, Robert Scott, Moskovich, Marvin Evans, Jr., Seandria
Richardson, Coghill, Correctional Medical Services, Correct Care Solutions, Corizon, Wendy
Kelley, Rory Griffen, Gardner, Norman, Laura Morgan, Donna Gail Cecil, Rice, and Crystal
Woods are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted.
2.

Plaintiff’s claims which relate to his neurological issues are dismissed as

insufficiently related to the allegations which form the basis of this suit.

3.

It is certified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma

pauperis appeal from the order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good
faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of August 2015.

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE