Scott v. Watson et al

Filing 23

ORDER that Plaintiff shall provide a single address at which he believes service for Defendant Davenport is most likely to succeed within 14 days of this order's entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 10/5/2015. (lej)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DEVERICK SCOTT, ADC #131042 v. PLAINTIFF 5:15CV00174-JM-JJV RANDY WATSON, Warden, Varner Unit; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After two unsuccessful service attempts (Doc. Nos. 10, 16), I ordered Plaintiff to provide a viable address for Defendant Michael Davenport. (Doc. No. 17.) In response, on October 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Notice and offered four possible addresses for Mr. Davenport. (Doc. No. 22.) He states this is “as close as [he] can get.” (Id. at 1.) While I commend Plaintiff for his diligence in obtaining these addresses, I am unwilling to attempt service at four addresses in the hopes of finding Defendant Davenport.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Plaintiff must identify what he believes to be the address of Defendant Davenport. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide a single address at which he believes service for Defendant Davenport is most likely to succeed. He should notify the Court of this address within fourteen (14) days of this Order’s entry. DATED this 5th day of October, 2015. JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 It is unlikely that each of these addresses refers to the same Michael Davenport Plaintiff named in his Complaint. Two are in Pine Bluff, Arkansas and two are in White Hall, Arkansas. (Doc. No. 22 at 2.) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?