Scott v. Watson et al
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Partial Report and Recommendations. Defendants Mark Stephens, Corey Paskel, Butler, Alex Copefield, Wilson, Wolfo, Powell, Jones, Phillip Esaw, Hicks, Bphens, J. Young, Malone, and Does are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief is DENIED. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/6/2015. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DEVERICK SCOTT, ADC #131042
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:15CV00174-JM-JJV
RANDY WATSON, Warden,
Varner Unit; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings
in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants Mark Stephens, Corey Paskel, Butler, Alex Copefield, Wilson, Wolfo,
Powell, Jones, Phillip Esaw, Hicks, Bphens, J. Young, Malone, and “Does” are DISMISSED
without prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff’s request for declaratory relief is DENIED.
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 6th day of July, 2015.
_______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?