Dixon et al v. Robinson et al
Filing
42
ORDER adopting 39 the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris; the claims of plaintiff James Dixon are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court's order. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/28/16. (tjb)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES DIXON et al
ADC #83733
V.
PLAINTIFFS
5:15CV00178 BRW/PSH
GERALD ROBINSON et al
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this
Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the claims of plaintiff James Dixon are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure respond to the
Court’s order.
DATED this 28th day of April, 2016.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
