Curtis v. Stanly et al
Filing
11
Order adopting 5 partial findings and recommendations in all respects; dismissing Plaintiff Ethan Curtis's claims against defendants Briggs and Lum for failure to state a claim; and directing the Clerk to terminate Briggs and Lum as defendants immediately. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 08/10/2015. (rhm)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ETHAN CURTIS,
ADC #659615
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:15CV00206 BSM
CLINT STANLY et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed partial findings and recommendations (“PRD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. No objection has been
filed. After careful consideration, the PRD are adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1
Plaintiff Ethan Curtis’s claims against defendants Briggs and Lum are
dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim.
2
The clerk is directed to terminate Briggs and Lum as defendants immediately.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of August 2015.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
