Holsombach v. Kelley et al

Filing 26

ORDER directing Defendants to immediately preserve the referenced videos within this Order. If video recordings have been lost, destroyed, or are no longer available (for any reason), Defendants must notify the Court within thirty days and provide a detailed explanation of why that evidence is no longer available and the names of all ADC employees who had any involvement in the destruction or loss of that evidence. The Court may schedule a hearing to take testimony from ADC employees concerning how and why the video recordings were lost or destroyed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/28/2015. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARK HOLSOMBACH ADC# 134723 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:15-CV-00222 BSM/BD WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Mark Holsombach has filed an objection to this Court’s Recommended Disposition alleging that there are videos that prove he is unsafe in administrative segregation. (Docket entry #19) Mr. Holsombach specifically references video surveillance of an event that took place in the Tucker Maximum Security Unit on May 20, 2015 (#19, p.16) and a security video from barracks 7 in the Tucker Maximum Security Unit on August 15, 2015 from 1:30 -1:40 p.m. (#19, p.20) Defendants must immediately preserve the referenced videos. If video recordings have been lost, destroyed, or are no longer available (for any reason), Defendants must notify the Court within thirty days and provide a detailed explanation of why that evidence is no longer available and the names of all ADC employees who had any involvement in the destruction or loss of that evidence. The Court may schedule a hearing to take testimony from ADC employees concerning how and why the video recordings were lost or destroyed. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of September, 2015. ___________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?