McClanton v. Brewing et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING 41 46 the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in all respects; denying 35 Mr. McClanton's motion for summary judgment; granting 37 Defendant Estella Bland's motion for summary judgment; and dismissing, with prejudice, 2 Mr. McClanton's complaint. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/29/2016. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RODNEY WILSON MCCLANTON, ADC #108785 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:15-cv-00230-KGB/JTK ROBERT BREVING, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received two Proposed Findings and Recommendations (“Recommendation”) filed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 41; 46). Plaintiff Rodney Wilson McClanton filed timely objections to the first Recommendation(Dkt. No. 45). After careful review of the first Recommendation and the timely objections filed by Mr. McClanton, including a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the first Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Mr. McClanton’s motion for summary judgment is denied (Dkt. No. 35). Mr. McClanton did not file objections to the second Recommendation, and the time to do so has passed. After careful review of the second Recommendation, the Court concludes that the second Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 46). Defendant Estella Bland’s motion for summary judgment is granted (Dkt. No. 37). Mr. McClanton’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. So ordered this 29th day of November, 2016. ___________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?