Nichols v. Sanders et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety; denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within 10 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. Plaintiff's 3 complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/1/2015. (ks) (Docket text modified on 9/1/2015 to correct a typographical error). (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BILLY MACK NICHOLS, JR., ADC #92713 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:15CV00260-JLH-JTK CHARLOTTE SANDERS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis DENIED. Document #1. 2. Should plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. 3. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of September, 2015. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?