Mosley v. Kelley

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 3 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 1 Plaintiff Mosley's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing, without prejudice, 2 the petition for writ of habeas corpus so that Mosley may see k authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive habeas; and denying a certificate of appealability, as there is no issue on which Mosley has made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/15/2015. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TOMMY RAY MOSLEY ADC #85548 V. PETITIONER CASE NO. 5:15cv00297-BSM-JTR WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the petitioner’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and making a de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and recommended disposition are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Mosley’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is granted. 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Doc. No. 2] filed by Mosley is dismissed without prejudice so that Mosley may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. 3. A certificate of appealability is denied, as there is no issue on which Mosley has made a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of October 2015. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?