Muhammad v. King et al
ORDER ADOPTING 61 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 49 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe; and denying 59 plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/15/2016. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD,
CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM
AMANDA KING et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations (“PRD”) filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. There have been no objections.
After a careful consideration, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Accordingly,
plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is
denied, defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 49] is granted, and
defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?