Muhammad v. King et al

Filing 62

ORDER ADOPTING 61 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 49 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe; and denying 59 plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/15/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD,
ADC #96905

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM
AMANDA KING et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations (“PRD”) filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. There have been no objections.
After a careful consideration, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Accordingly,
plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is
denied, defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 49] is granted, and
defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July 2016.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE