Muhammad v. King et al

Filing 62

ORDER ADOPTING 61 the proposed findings and recommendations; granting 49 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing without prejudice defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe; and denying 59 plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendants' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/15/2016. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD, ADC #96905 PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM AMANDA KING et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendations (“PRD”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney have been reviewed. There have been no objections. After a careful consideration, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 59] is denied, defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 49] is granted, and defendants Kimberly Snow and Mandy Roe are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of July 2016. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?