Muhammad v. King et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 3 the proposed findings and partial recommendations in all respects; and dismissing, with prejudice, Muhammad's claims against defendants K. Hardgrave, CCS, and A. Gray. Pursuant to 6 Muhammad's request, Dr. Steve is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/28/2015. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD
ADC #96905
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM

A. KING et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and partial recommendations (“PRD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff Michael Muhammad’s objections
thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo
review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Moreover, pursuant to
Muhammad’s request, Dr. Steve is dismissed as a defendant. See Doc. No. 6.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1

Muhammad’s claims against defendants K. Hardgrave, CCS, and A. Gray are

dismissed with prejudice.
2

Pursuant to Muhammad’s request, Dr. Steve is voluntarily dismissed with

prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October 2015.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE