Muhammad v. King et al
ORDER adopting 3 the proposed findings and partial recommendations in all respects; and dismissing, with prejudice, Muhammad's claims against defendants K. Hardgrave, CCS, and A. Gray. Pursuant to 6 Muhammad's request, Dr. Steve is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/28/2015. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL PERRY MUHAMMAD
CASE NO. 5:15CV00320 BSM
A. KING et al.
The proposed findings and partial recommendations (“PRD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney and plaintiff Michael Muhammad’s objections
thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo
review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. Moreover, pursuant to
Muhammad’s request, Dr. Steve is dismissed as a defendant. See Doc. No. 6.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Muhammad’s claims against defendants K. Hardgrave, CCS, and A. Gray are
dismissed with prejudice.
Pursuant to Muhammad’s request, Dr. Steve is voluntarily dismissed with
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?