Hughes v. Fread et al

Filing 9

ORDER approving and adopting 4 Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief maybe granted; the dismissal counts as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/08/2016. (rhm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
OTIS HUGHES,
ADC # 100835
v.

PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:15-cv-322-KGB-JTR

ROBBIE FREAD, Administrator,
Arkansas County Detention Center, et al.

DEFENDANT

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Tom Ray (Dkt. No. 4). Plaintiff Otis Hughes filed untimely objections to the
Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 6). After review of the Recommended Disposition and Mr.
Hughes’s objections, along with a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Disposition is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. The dismissal counts as a “strike” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal
from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this 8th day of December, 2016.

Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge