Sirkaneo v. Watson et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING 4 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice Sirkaneo's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal counts as a "strike." It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/4/2015. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
QATONIOUS LEE SIRKANEO
ADC #105681
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:15CV00362 BSM

RANDY WATSON et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and plaintiff Qatonious Lee Sirkaneo’s objections
thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo
review of the record, the RD are hereby approved in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Sirkaneo’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3.

It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 4th day of December 2015.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE