Feuget v. Kelley

Filing 24

ORDER adopting in their entirety 19 the proposed findings and recommendations; dismissing with prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 1 Feuget's petition for wit of habeas corpus, and denying the relief requested. A certificate of appealability will not be granted because Feuget has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/7/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL FEUGET
v.

PETITIONER
CASE NO. 5:15CV00388 BSM

WENDY KELLEY, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction

RESPONDENT
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommendations [Doc. No. 19] submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been received along with petitioner Michael
Feuget’s objections and respondent Wendy Kelley’s response to Feuget’s objections. See
Doc. Nos. 22, 23. After careful consideration of the record, the proposed findings and
recommendations are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Feuget’s petition for writ of
habeas corpus [Doc. No. 1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254 is dismissed with prejudice,
and the relief sought is denied. A certificate of appealability will not be granted because
Feuget has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of July 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE