Knight v. Stieve et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting the partial recommendation, 8 , and overruling Knight's objections, 11 . If Knight wants to assert claims against Griffin, then he must ask for permission to amend his complaint again. Knight's claims against Stieve, Yarbrough, Gardner, Key, Wilson, Griffin, and the Doe Defendants are therefore dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TEVIN D. KNIGHT v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:16-cv-19-DPM-JJV STIEVE, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions Medical Director; DOTTIE YARBROUGH, Area Administrator, Correct Care Solutions; CHARLOTTE GARDNER, Regional Ombudsman, Correct Care Solutions, GERALDINE CAMPBELL, APN, East Arkansas Regional Unit; YAVONDA KEY, LPN, East Arkansas Regional Unit; GEORGE WILSON, Medical Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; RORY GRIFFIN, Deputy Medical Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; DOES, ADC employees, CCS employees; and PITTMAN, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, NQ 8, and overrules Knight's objections, NQ 11. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Knight can't use his objections to shore up his amended complaint. If Knight wants to assert claims against Griffin, then he must ask for permission to amend his complaint again. But as it stands now, Knight's amended complaint fails to state a claim against Griffin and several other Defendants. Knight's claims against Stieve, Yarbrough, Gardner, Key, Wilson, Griffin, and the Doe Defendants are therefore dismissed without prejudice. So Ordered. ;t D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?