Knight v. Stieve et al
ORDER adopting the partial recommendation, 8 , and overruling Knight's objections, 11 . If Knight wants to assert claims against Griffin, then he must ask for permission to amend his complaint again. Knight's claims against Stieve, Yarbrough, Gardner, Key, Wilson, Griffin, and the Doe Defendants are therefore dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/20/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TEVIN D. KNIGHT
STIEVE, Doctor, Correct Care Solutions
Medical Director; DOTTIE YARBROUGH,
Area Administrator, Correct Care Solutions;
CHARLOTTE GARDNER, Regional Ombudsman,
Correct Care Solutions, GERALDINE CAMPBELL,
APN, East Arkansas Regional Unit; YAVONDA
KEY, LPN, East Arkansas Regional Unit; GEORGE
WILSON, Medical Director, Arkansas Department
of Correction; RORY GRIFFIN, Deputy Medical
Director, Arkansas Department of Correction;
DOES, ADC employees, CCS employees; and
PITTMAN, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit
On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, NQ 8,
and overrules Knight's objections, NQ 11. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Knight can't
use his objections to shore up his amended complaint. If Knight wants to
assert claims against Griffin, then he must ask for permission to amend his
complaint again. But as it stands now, Knight's amended complaint fails to
state a claim against Griffin and several other Defendants. Knight's claims
against Stieve, Yarbrough, Gardner, Key, Wilson, Griffin, and the Doe
Defendants are therefore dismissed without prejudice.
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?